Tradition

Physiocracy

18th century

The first systematic school of economics: that land and agriculture alone create new wealth, that the economy is a circulating natural order, and that government should therefore let it alone.

Physiocracy was the first attempt to describe an economy as a system rather than a policy problem, and the first to draw the conclusion that it should mostly be left alone.

Quesnay, physician to Louis XV, built the Tableau économique (1758) as a circulation diagram in the manner of the blood: value moves between the productive class of cultivators, the proprietors, and the "sterile" class of artisans and merchants, who transform matter without adding to the total. Only land yields a produit net — a surplus over the cost of production — so agriculture is the sole source of new wealth, and all taxation should fall on the landowner in a single tax, every other levy being merely passed along.

The economics is wrong and the method is decisive. Treating the economy as an interdependent circular flow, with equilibrium conditions and a reproducible surplus, is the move that makes economics a science, and both Marx and the input-output tradition acknowledged the Tableau as an ancestor.

The politics is "legal despotism": a sovereign undivided in power but wholly bound by a natural order he does not author and cannot alter. This is where the school's famous slogan comes from — laissez faire, laissez passer — and where its interest in China comes in. Quesnay read the Jesuit accounts as evidence that a great empire had already been governed on these principles for millennia, and Le Despotisme de la Chine (1767) made the argument at length; contemporaries called him the Confucius of Europe. Turgot, as controller-general, briefly attempted the program in office and was destroyed by the resistance.

Lineage

Descends from

  • Mercantilism16th to 18th century

    The Tableau was built to answer the mercantile system on its own ground, and takes from it the premise it then inverts: that a nation's wealth is a definite quantity policy can be held responsible for.

Gave rise to

  • Political Economy18th century to present

    Smith met Quesnay in Paris and meant to dedicate the Wealth of Nations to him; the circular flow, the produit net and laissez faire all pass into classical economics even as the exclusive productivity of land is discarded.

Formed against

  • Mercantilism16th to 18th century

    The Physiocrats held that Colbert had beggared French agriculture to subsidise manufactures, mistaking treasure for wealth and the sterile class for the productive one.

Thinkers2