Tradition

Mutualism

19th century to present

The anti-capitalist anarchist tradition founded by Proudhon, holding that voluntary cooperation, worker ownership of the means of production, and reformed credit and exchange — not state action — are the path to economic justice.

Mutualism is the anti-capitalist anarchist tradition Pierre-Joseph Proudhon founded in mid-nineteenth-century France. Economic justice, on its account, requires neither state coercion nor capitalist ownership, but the voluntary association of producers exchanging the products of their own labor on equitable terms.

What Is Property? (1840) introduced the claim that property is theft. The target was not personal possession but absentee ownership, and the rent, interest and profit by which Proudhon argued capital captures what labor produces. His constructive program centered on producer cooperatives, mutual credit institutions lending at cost instead of at interest, and contractual federation replacing the state as the coordinator of large-scale economic life. He tried to found a People's Bank on these lines in 1849. It failed within months.

Mutualism is the historical root of market socialism. It was the first tradition to argue that markets and competition could be kept while ownership was decentralized to those who actually labor, an insight twentieth-century market socialists adapted to industrial scale. It differs from individualist anarchism in its emphasis on cooperative federation and its direct attack on wage labor, since mutualists treat the employer-employee relation itself as the central injustice. Individualist anarchists care more about sovereignty against any external authority and prescribe less about economic form.

Proudhon was also the target of the most famous polemic in socialist history. Marx's The Poverty of Philosophy (1847) dismissed the mutualist program as petty-bourgeois nostalgia for small proprietorship in an age of large-scale industry, an objection mutualists have been answering ever since. Proudhon's own writings on Jews and on women are ugly enough that the tradition's modern adherents generally repudiate them instead of contextualizing them.

Lineage

Descends from

  • Political Economy18th century to present

    Proudhon argued inside the categories of classical political economy — property, rent, interest — in order to turn them against it.

  • RepublicanismAncient to present

    Proudhon wrote out of the French artisanal republican tradition, and his federalism is a republican answer to the centralized state.

Gave rise to

  • Individualist Anarchism19th century to present

    Tucker's four monopolies are Proudhon's critique of capitalist ownership recast for an American context of free markets and individual sovereignty.

  • Social Anarchism19th century to present

    Bakunin took Proudhon's anti-statism and anti-capitalism and pushed past mutual exchange to common ownership.

  • SyndicalismLate 19th to early 20th century

    Proudhon's federalism of producers' associations is the direct ancestor of the claim that the union is the structure that will run production.

Converges with

  • Distributism20th century to present

    Both hold that ownership should be spread rather than concentrated, and arrive there from Catholic social teaching and Proudhonian anarchism respectively.

Thinkers3
Voices today2 living

Living writers, politicians and public figures working in this tradition today. Association, not endorsement: a figure appears where their stated commitments place them, and is reachable by role and search like everyone else.

Defining tradition for1
Related through shared thinkers3