Libertarian Haplotype Rarity: ~0.5% of population

Anarcho-Capitalist

You believe all government is illegitimate coercion. Free markets and voluntary contracts should replace every state function, from roads to courts to defense.

Orientation: Stateless capitalism, voluntary contracts, abolition of government

Dimension Scores

Liberty
87
Markets
87
Global
50
Culture
50

Understanding This Type

Anarcho-Capitalists represent the most radically libertarian expression within the Political DNA taxonomy: individuals who believe that government is not merely inefficient but fundamentally unnecessary. They hold that free markets, voluntary contracts, and decentralized private institutions can perform nearly all—if not all—functions currently provided by the state.

Anarcho-Capitalism (often shortened to "AnCap") is rooted in a philosophical tradition that merges classical liberalism, Austrian economics, and individual sovereignty into a coherent worldview. While libertarians generally advocate shrinking the state, Anarcho-Capitalists take this logic to its endpoint: a society in which the state dissolves into a competitive marketplace of private governance providers.

They argue that taxation is a form of coercion, state monopolies breed inefficiency and corruption, and that voluntary systems outperform compulsory ones in both ethics and outcomes. For AnCaps, the question isn't "How big should government be?" but rather "Why should it exist at all?"

Culturally, Anarcho-Capitalists often display high openness to experimentation, particularly with new governance models enabled by technology—digital identity systems, blockchain arbitration, private security networks, and competitive insurance-based legal frameworks.

While rare (roughly 0.5% of the population), Anarcho-Capitalists form one of the most intellectually distinctive strains in the political ecosystem. They often play an outsized role in online discourse, technological innovation spaces, and debates about the limits of state power. Although often caricatured as utopian, many adherents see AnCap not as an immediate destination but as a directional ideal: a north star guiding incremental moves toward greater decentralization, privatization, and voluntary association.

Dimension Analysis

Personal Liberty

87

This is the strain's defining feature. AnCaps are near-absolute in their preference for individual autonomy, self-ownership, bodily rights, and freedom from state interference.

  • Full drug legalization—what you put in your body is your choice
  • Complete deregulation of speech, movement, and association
  • Broad support for experimental communities: startup cities, seasteading, autonomous zones
  • Self-ownership as foundational principle from which all rights derive

Market Economy

87

AnCaps see markets not just as useful but as morally superior mechanisms for distributing resources and coordinating human action.

  • Total deregulation of all industries
  • Privatized infrastructure: roads, utilities, courts
  • Competing legal and arbitration systems
  • Full free trade without any tariffs or restrictions

Global Orientation

50

This strain splits into two tendencies, resulting in a moderate average. Cosmopolitan AnCaps support global free movement while Localist AnCaps focus on opt-in governance with less trust in any large-scale institutions.

  • Cosmopolitan AnCaps: Support global free movement of labor, capital, and ideas
  • Localist AnCaps: Focus on opt-in governance with less trust in any large-scale institutions
  • Both reject state borders as illegitimate, but differ on property-based alternatives
  • Hoppe vs. open-borders Rothbard represents this internal debate

Cultural Values

50

Anarcho-Capitalists vary significantly on cultural issues, united more by anti-coercion than by any cultural stance.

  • Some skew culturally progressive due to emphasis on personal freedom
  • Others skew conservative but with a "don't legislate values" approach
  • The uniting factor is anti-coercion, not culture itself
  • Voluntary communities can be as traditional or progressive as members choose

Core Beliefs

  • The state is unnecessary and harmful—a monopoly on violence that crowds out better alternatives
  • All services (courts, police, roads, defense) can and should be privately provided through competitive markets
  • Taxation is theft—there is no legitimate way for government to take people's money without consent
  • Voluntary contracts and markets are ethically superior to government force in all circumstances
  • Property rights are inviolable—the foundation upon which all other rights rest
  • Competition, not central authority, produces better governance outcomes and innovation

Internal Tensions

  • How to prevent private monopolies from becoming de facto governments
  • Whether universal rights can exist without a state to enforce them
  • Balancing property absolutism with real-world social needs and commons problems
  • Enforcement of contracts without a central authority to appeal to
  • Open borders vs. property-based immigration control (Hoppe vs. Rothbard debate)

Foundational Thinkers

Murray Rothbard

Founder of anarcho-capitalism, author of Man, Economy, and State (1926-1995)

Ludwig von Mises

Austrian School economist whose work underpins anarcho-capitalist theory (1881-1973)

Hans-Hermann Hoppe

Developed argumentation ethics defense of private property anarchism

David Friedman

Consequentialist anarcho-capitalist, author of Machinery of Freedom

Lysander Spooner

19th century individualist anarchist who influenced Rothbard (1808-1887)

Contemporary Voices

Michael Malice

Author, podcaster, and anarchist provocateur with large social media following

Keith Knight

Dont Tread on Anyone podcast host and voluntaryist

Lew Rockwell

Founder of LewRockwell.com and Mises Institute chairman

Jeff Deist

Former Mises Institute president and Ron Paul chief of staff

Peter Thiel

Billionaire tech investor funding libertarian causes and seasteading

Communities & Spaces

r/Anarcho_Capitalism Reddit

Reddit hub for stateless capitalism discussion

Bitcoin Twitter/Crypto Twitter X/Twitter

Crypto-anarchists building parallel financial systems

Mises Institute Forums Web

Austrian economics discussion and debate

Liberty.me Web

Subscription community for libertarian content

AnCap Discord servers Discord

Real-time discussion of theory and praxis

Key Institutions

Mises Institute

Austrian economics and anarcho-capitalist scholarship hub in Auburn, Alabama

Property and Freedom Society

Annual conference founded by Hans-Hermann Hoppe promoting private property anarchism

Center for a Stateless Society

Left-market anarchist think tank promoting freed markets

Libertarian Party Mises Caucus

Radical wing of LP pushing anarcho-capitalist principles

Foundation for Economic Education

Free-market educational organization founded 1946

How It Compares

vs. Traditional Libertarian (Minarchist Cousin)

Aspect Anarcho-Capitalist Traditional Libertarian
State Abolish entirely Minimal but necessary
Taxation Always illegitimate Necessary evil, minimize
Legal System Privately provided State courts, limited scope
Focus Eliminating the state Cultural preservation + liberty

vs. Left Libertarian (Anti-State Cousins)

Aspect Anarcho-Capitalist Left Libertarian
Property Absolute private property Use-based possession
Capitalism Embrace it fully Distinguish from freed markets
Corporations Would exist without state State-created entities
Inequality Natural outcome of freedom Often state-caused

vs. Civil Libertarian (Liberty Allies)

Aspect Anarcho-Capitalist Civil Libertarian
State Abolish entirely Limited to rights protection
Courts Private arbitration State courts with strong rights
Taxation Always theft Accept for core functions
Focus All freedoms equally Civil liberties primary

Common Critiques

Without antitrust enforcement, private security or arbitration firms might consolidate into de facto states
States themselves are the ultimate monopolies. Market competition, reputation systems, and consumer choice provide stronger checks on consolidation than political processes. If a private firm became state-like, it would face the same legitimacy crisis as existing states.
How would non-excludable goods like national defense or disease prevention be funded voluntarily?
AnCaps point to historical examples of private provision (lighthouses, fire companies) and modern innovations (assurance contracts, dominant assurance contracts, proprietary communities). The public goods problem is overrated; most "public goods" are actually excludable with proper technology.
Stateless societies historically have been conquered by states, suggesting vulnerability
Historical stateless societies lacked modern technology for coordination and defense. A modern AnCap society with advanced weapons, private defense agencies, and decentralized organization would be highly resistant to conquest. Guerrilla warfare shows how decentralized forces resist centralized armies.
Who enforces arbitration rulings against powerful actors who refuse to comply?
Reputation, economic ostracism, insurance requirements, and mutual defense associations. Non-compliance would mean exclusion from the network of commerce and protection. In practice, most dispute resolution works through economic incentives, not force.
Would the wealthy simply purchase more "justice" in a fully privatized system?
They already do under state systems—through lawyers, bail, and political influence. Private arbitration is actually more accessible than state courts. Competition among arbitration providers would drive down costs and drive up quality. The poor are worst served by the current state monopoly on justice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither in the traditional sense. Anarcho-Capitalism is anti-state and pro-market, placing it outside the conventional left-right spectrum. It shares the left's skepticism of authority but the right's embrace of private property and markets. Many AnCaps reject the left-right framing entirely, preferring a liberty-authority axis.
No. Anarcho-Capitalists oppose state monopolies over law, not law itself. They advocate for competitive legal systems provided by private arbitration firms, insurance companies, and voluntary communities. The idea is that competition produces better, more just legal frameworks than state monopoly.
Traditional anarchism (anarcho-communism, anarcho-syndicalism) rejects private property as a form of hierarchy and oppression. Anarcho-Capitalists strongly defend private property rights as the foundation of a free society. This is why left-anarchists often reject the "anarchist" label for AnCaps, while AnCaps argue that property rights are essential to meaningful freedom.
Most adherents see it as a long-term directional ideal rather than an immediate policy program. They point to historical examples of private law (medieval Iceland, American frontier justice, Law Merchant) and modern innovations (cryptocurrency, private arbitration, special economic zones) as proof of concept. The path forward often focuses on building parallel institutions and "exit" options rather than political reform.
This is a genuinely contested issue within the movement. Some AnCaps (following Rothbard's later work and Hoppe) argue that in the absence of a state, property owners would control access to their land, leading to decentralized immigration control. Others argue that state borders are themselves illegitimate restrictions on movement and trade. The split often correlates with cosmopolitan vs. localist tendencies.

Is This Your Political DNA?

Take the Political DNA Scan to discover your type among 32 distinct political strains.

Take the Quiz →