Libertarian Haplotype Rarity: ~2% of population

Left Libertarian

You oppose both state and corporate tyranny. True freedom requires personal liberty plus economic democracy - worker ownership, not government control.

Orientation: Anti-state, anti-corporate, pro-worker, decentralist

Dimension Scores

Liberty
78
Markets
33
Global
50
Culture
50

Understanding This Type

Left Libertarians occupy one of the most misunderstood positions in political philosophy: they combine a radical commitment to individual liberty with a sharp critique of capitalism as it actually exists. Their key insight is that much of what we call 'capitalism' is actually a system of state-granted privileges—intellectual property, limited liability, regulatory capture, subsidies—that benefits corporations at the expense of workers and consumers.

In a truly free market, Left Libertarians argue, we would see far less corporate hierarchy and far more worker ownership, cooperatives, and mutual aid societies. The giant corporation is not a natural market outcome but a creature of state privilege. Strip away these privileges, and the economy would reorganize around smaller, more democratic enterprises where workers own the means of production—not through state mandate but through voluntary association.

This tradition traces back to the original anarchists: Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, who declared 'property is theft' while defending possession and use; Benjamin Tucker, who saw monopolies in land, money, tariffs, and patents as the 'four monopolies' that capitalism required and freedom would dissolve; and more recently, Samuel Konkin's agorism, which advocated building counter-economic institutions outside state control.

Left Libertarians share the anarcho-capitalist's opposition to the state but reject the idea that existing property distributions are legitimate. Much current wealth, they argue, traces back to theft, conquest, and state privilege. They support freed markets—markets genuinely free of state intervention on behalf of capital—while expecting such markets to produce far more egalitarian outcomes than we see today.

At roughly 2% of the population, Left Libertarians are a small but intellectually vibrant strain. They appeal to those who share progressive concerns about corporate power and inequality but are skeptical that government solutions will help. They're found in cooperative movements, agorist counter-economics, and parts of the anarchist milieu that haven't abandoned markets entirely.

Dimension Analysis

Personal Liberty

78

Very high commitment to personal liberty, with emphasis on freedoms that empower individuals against both state and corporate domination.

  • Full bodily autonomy—drugs, sex work, medical choices
  • Radical free speech, including against corporations
  • Right to organize, strike, and engage in labor action
  • Squatting abandoned property—use it or lose it

Market Economy

33

Low on conventional capitalism but high on genuine markets. Left Libertarians distinguish 'capitalism' (state-privileged corporate dominance) from 'free markets' (voluntary exchange without privilege).

  • Abolish intellectual property—ideas should be free
  • End corporate limited liability—owners should bear full responsibility
  • Eliminate all corporate subsidies, bailouts, and regulatory capture
  • Support worker cooperatives, mutual aid, and alternative economies

Global Orientation

50

Mixed on globalism. Opposes both nationalist restrictions and corporate globalization, preferring decentralized, human-scale institutions.

  • Skeptical of both national borders and global institutions
  • Support free movement of people, oppose free movement of capital privileges
  • Prefer local and federated structures to either nation-states or global bodies
  • International worker solidarity over corporate or state internationalism

Cultural Values

50

Culturally diverse. Left Libertarians include both progressive counterculture types and those who simply want to be left alone to build alternative communities.

  • Support for alternative lifestyles and voluntary communities
  • Opposition to both state and social coercion on personal matters
  • Some embrace progressive social values; others are culturally neutral
  • Emphasis on building new culture rather than reforming existing institutions

Core Beliefs

  • Capitalism as we know it is a state-created system of privilege, not a free market
  • In truly free markets, worker ownership and cooperatives would outcompete corporate hierarchy
  • Intellectual property is monopoly privilege that stifles innovation and concentrates wealth
  • Landlordism is extractive—people should own what they use, not extract rent from others' use
  • Big business and big government are allies, not enemies—both oppress workers
  • Build alternatives now—counter-economics, mutual aid, dual power—don't wait for political change

Internal Tensions

  • Whether to engage in electoral politics or focus purely on counter-economics
  • How much to work with traditional leftists who want state solutions
  • Whether existing property claims have any legitimacy given historical theft
  • Balancing individual liberty with solidarity and collective action

Foundational Thinkers

Pierre-Joseph Proudhon

First self-declared anarchist, mutualist economist (1809-1865)

Benjamin Tucker

19th century individualist anarchist and editor (1854-1939)

Karl Hess

Former Goldwater speechwriter turned left-libertarian (1923-1994)

Samuel Edward Konkin III

Founder of agorism and counter-economics (1947-2004)

Voltairine de Cleyre

Individualist anarchist and feminist (1866-1912)

Contemporary Voices

Kevin Carson

Prolific writer on freed markets and worker ownership

Roderick Long

Auburn philosopher bridging left and right libertarianism

Gary Chartier

La Sierra University professor on market anarchism

Sheldon Richman

Libertarian writer evolved toward left-libertarianism

Charles Johnson

Philosopher and C4SS contributor

Communities & Spaces

r/LibertarianLeft Reddit

Left-libertarian discussion and theory

r/Anarchism Reddit

Anarchist theory and organizing

Antifa networks Various/Encrypted

Decentralized anti-fascist organizing

Agorist communities Various

Counter-economics and gray markets

Cooperative movement spaces Various

Worker-owned business networks

Key Institutions

Center for a Stateless Society (C4SS)

Left-market anarchist think tank

CrimethInc

Anarchist media and publishing collective

It's Going Down

Anarchist/antifa news aggregator

Industrial Workers of the World (IWW)

Radical labor union compatible with market anarchism

Molinari Institute

Promotes market anarchism and left-libertarianism

How It Compares

vs. Anarcho-Capitalist (Right-Wing Cousin)

Aspect Left Libertarian Anarcho-Capitalist
Property Occupancy and use Absolute ownership
Corporations State creatures Legitimate businesses
Capitalism Critique existing form Defend as freedom
Expected outcome Egalitarian Hierarchical OK

vs. Democratic Socialist (Leftist Rival)

Aspect Left Libertarian Democratic Socialist
State Abolish entirely Use for workers
Methods Counter-economics Electoral politics
Markets Freed markets good Markets problematic
Planning Emergent order Democratic control

vs. Civil Libertarian (Progressive Libertarian Ally)

Aspect Left Libertarian Civil Libertarian
Capitalism Critical Accepting
Corporations Oppose as privileged Regulate if needed
Focus Economic transformation Personal freedoms
System change Revolutionary Reformist

Common Critiques

You're just socialists who don't want to admit it
We support markets—genuinely free markets without state privilege. Socialists want state ownership or central planning. We want voluntary exchange, just without the deck stacked in favor of capital. That's the opposite of socialism.
Without corporate structure, complex production would be impossible
Cooperatives like Mondragon employ tens of thousands and compete globally. The corporate form isn't the only way to organize complex enterprises—it's just the form that receives state privilege through limited liability and legal personhood.
Abolishing intellectual property would kill innovation
Most innovation happened before modern IP regimes and continues in fields with weak IP protection. Copyright and patents primarily benefit large corporations that can afford lawyers, not individual creators. Open source software shows what's possible without IP monopolies.
Your ideal society has never existed
Neither has a truly free market of any kind—state intervention is ubiquitous. But we can see hints of what's possible in cooperatives, mutual aid societies, open source communities, and historical examples like medieval guild systems that operated without corporate privilege.
Isn't occupancy-and-use property just another form of coercion?
All property systems involve some coercion to enforce. The question is which system is most justifiable. We think claims based on actual use are more defensible than absentee ownership that allows extraction from others' labor.

Frequently Asked Questions

Socialists typically want state ownership or democratic control of production through political processes. Left Libertarians want to abolish the state entirely and let freed markets naturally evolve toward worker ownership. We're anti-state; socialists want to capture the state.
We support personal property—things you use and occupy. We're skeptical of absentee ownership that lets people extract rent from others' productive use. This is the mutualist distinction between 'property' (exploitative) and 'possession' (legitimate). Your house, your tools, your business you work in: all fine. Owning thousands of homes to extract rent: problematic.
Agorism and counter-economics: building alternative institutions now rather than waiting for political change. Cooperatives, mutual aid societies, cryptocurrency, informal economies, intentional communities. The goal is dual power—making the state irrelevant by building better alternatives.
We don't think corporations are more efficient—they appear so only because of state privileges. Limited liability, corporate personhood, intellectual property, and regulatory capture all favor large corporations. Remove these privileges, and cooperatives would be competitive or superior.
We share opposition to the state but disagree about capitalism. AnCaps defend existing property distributions and corporate forms. We think these are products of state violence and privilege. In a truly free market, we expect much more egalitarian outcomes—not because we'd mandate them, but because hierarchy requires subsidy.

Is This Your Political DNA?

Take the Political DNA Scan to discover your type among 32 distinct political strains.

Take the Quiz →