Archetype
We estimate roughly 2% of people fit this profile — about 1 in 50.
You oppose both state and corporate tyranny. True freedom requires personal liberty plus economic democracy - worker ownership, not government control.
Wondering if this is you? Take the 4-minute assessment →A snapshot of where this archetype sits — what holds it together, what it inherits, and where it meets others on the map.
The thinkers whose ideas this type descends from. Most lived in other eras and never identified with it.
1756–1836
Coercive authority in every form — government, law, organized religion, even property — stunts human development rather than ordering it; strip it away and voluntary cooperation is what's left. Godwin was the first to make that case systematically, and the tradition your type belongs to dates its start to him.
1809–1865
Proudhon refused both the boss and the state, offering mutual aid and voluntary federation in their place. His conviction that real freedom means ending domination in the economy, not just politics, runs straight into your type — it starts in What is Property?
1814–1876
You carry the conviction that seizing the state only rebuilds the cage in new hands — a warning he aimed at Marx and the coming workers' dictatorship. His collectivist anarchism binds two things you refuse to trade against each other: liberty without equality is privilege, equality without liberty is servitude.
1839–1897
The earth belongs to everyone; what you make belongs to you. Progress and Poverty turned that distinction into a single remedy, tax the land and untax the work, that still defines the left edge of libertarian thought.
1869–1940
Freedom that stops at the factory gate or the bedroom door is no freedom at all. Goldman's Anarchism and Other Essays claims liberty whole, against the state and the boss alike, in the voice this tradition still argues in.
1869–1948
Distrust the centralized industrial state no matter who runs it, and you've taken up Gandhi's anarchist strand — the one that faulted British imperialism and Nehru's state-building alike, answering both with decentralized, self-sufficient communities. That line runs straight through your politics.
Public figures associated with this position today. Listed for recognition, not endorsement.
When you refuse the trade-off between liberty and social equality, you're taking the stand he made his own: the two aren't rivals but complements, and a free market worth the name turns out to be an anti-capitalist one.
b. 1949
Free-market principle needn't serve corporations or war — pushed honestly, it turns against both and against the state that shields them. That fusion of anti-statism with an anti-war, anti-corporate conscience is the ground you're standing on.
The intellectual tradition this type is rooted in.
Traditions reached through the thinkers above — the more of them a tradition claims, the more this type leans on it.
A four-minute assessment across four axes — no account required, no signup, no spam.
Begin the assessment