David Hume
Thinker

David Hume

1711–1776 · Scottish · philosopher

David Hume was a Scottish Enlightenment philosopher whose skeptical empiricism grounded politics in custom and sentiment, pairing conservative respect for institutions with liberal gradualism

David Hume was, by all accounts, the most cheerful philosopher in the history of philosophy. He was famously generous, witty, beloved by his friends, comfortable at parties, indifferent to honors, and unbothered by the religious orthodoxies he spent his career quietly demolishing. Adam Smith called him "as nearly approaching to the idea of a perfectly wise and virtuous man as perhaps the nature of human frailty will permit." When Hume was on his deathbed, James Boswell visited him hoping to witness a frightened recantation of his religious skepticism, and was disappointed to find Hume calm, cheerful, and looking forward to non-existence with the same equanimity with which he had lived.

Hume was born in Edinburgh in 1711 to a minor Scottish gentry family. He showed early intellectual promise, was sent to the University of Edinburgh at ten, and decided sometime in his teenage years that he wanted to devote his life to philosophy. He made his major intellectual breakthrough between the ages of twenty-three and twenty-six, in a small French town called La Flèche, where he wrote A Treatise of Human Nature, the book that contained almost all the philosophical positions for which he is now famous. He published it anonymously in 1739, expected it to make him famous, and was crushed when it sank without making any impression. He spent the next thirty years recovering from that disappointment, eventually finding success not as a philosopher but as a historian — his multi-volume History of England was a bestseller for decades after his death.

The philosophical work Hume thought was a failure turned out to be one of the most important books in the history of Western thought. The Treatise is best known for two arguments. The first is Hume's analysis of causation: when we say that one event causes another, what we actually observe is just one event followed by another. The "necessary connection" we imagine between cause and effect is not something we perceive in the world, it's something our minds add through habit, after experiencing similar sequences many times. This was a devastating result for the rationalist tradition that had been trying to ground science in self-evident causal principles. The second is Hume's distinction between facts and values, sometimes called "Hume's guillotine": you cannot derive an "ought" from an "is." No accumulation of factual claims about the world can produce a moral conclusion without smuggling in some additional moral premise. This argument has shaped almost all subsequent moral philosophy.

Hume's political philosophy is less famous than his metaphysics and epistemology, but it's deeply consequential. He rejected the social contract framework that Hobbes and Locke had developed, on the grounds that no actual society had ever been founded by an explicit contract among free individuals — the framework was a myth, and a myth that obscured how political authority actually develops. Real political legitimacy, Hume argued, comes from custom, habit, and the gradual accumulation of practices that have proven workable over time. We obey governments not because we have rationally consented to them but because we have grown up under them, because they generally work, and because the alternatives are usually worse. This was a deeply conservative claim in some ways, giving existing institutions a presumption of legitimacy that the social contract tradition had withheld, but it was also liberal in its commitment to gradual reform and its skepticism of grand revolutionary projects.

Hume also developed an account of moral judgment grounded in sentiment rather than reason. We don't reason our way to moral conclusions, Hume thought; we feel them. When we see an act of cruelty, our disapproval is an immediate emotional response, not the conclusion of a syllogism. Adam Smith, Hume's closest friend, would later build his own moral philosophy directly on this Humean foundation.

Hume died in Edinburgh in 1776 at sixty-five. His friend Smith published a moving account of his final days, emphasizing his courage and serenity in the face of death — a deliberate provocation to the Christian readers who had expected someone with Hume's beliefs to die in terror. Hume's influence on subsequent philosophy is hard to overstate. Kant credited Hume with awakening him from his "dogmatic slumber." The entire tradition of analytical philosophy in the 20th century works in Hume's shadow. And anyone who has ever wondered how to ground morality and politics without appealing to God, eternal Forms, or self-evident reason is grappling with the questions Hume put on the table.

Wondering where you land? Take the 4-minute assessment
Major works4
  1. A Treatise of Human Nature1739

    Hume's massive early work, containing almost all his major philosophical positions — initially a commercial failure but later recognized as one of the most important works in modern philosophy. Published in two volumes, 1739-1740.

  2. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding1748

    Hume's later, shorter, and more accessible reworking of the epistemological arguments from the Treatise.

  3. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion1779

    Hume's devastating critique of arguments for the existence of God, written in dialogue form so it could be published after his death.

  4. History of England1754-1761

    Hume's six-volume history that made his reputation in his lifetime, more widely read than his philosophical works for nearly a century after his death.

Traditions3
Archetypes4
Influences & connections19

David Hume's influence is too pervasive to map in full — these are among the most direct and consequential lines.

Intellectual lineage

  • Friedrich Hayek

    The 20th century Austrian economist and political philosopher who explicitly drew on Hume's evolutionary account of social institutions and his skepticism of constructivist rationalism in politics.

  • Immanuel Kant

    Famously credited Hume with awakening him from his "dogmatic slumber" — Kant's entire critical philosophy was an attempt to answer the skeptical challenges Hume had raised about causation and the limits of reason.

  • John Locke

    The earlier British empiricist whose foundational distinction between primary and secondary qualities, and whose general empirical method, gave Hume the framework he then pushed to its skeptical conclusions.

  • Nicolas Malebranche

    The argument that no necessary connection can be conceived between any two events is Malebranche's; Hume kept the analysis and removed God, leaving custom to do the work divine volition had done.

  • Sextus Empiricus

    The regress of justification reappears in Hume's treatment of causation and induction, together with the Pyrrhonist conclusion that nature relieves us of doubts reason cannot.

  • Francis Hutcheson

    Hume took over the anti-rationalist case — that reason alone never moves anyone to act — and pressed it much further than Hutcheson, who thought the conclusion dangerous and opposed his candidacy for a chair.

  • Marcus Tullius Cicero

    The Roman statesman and philosopher whose works on moral philosophy, particularly On Duties, gave Hume the model of secular ethics grounded in human nature rather than divine command.

  • Pierre Bayle

    Hume drew on Bayle's articles for the dilemmas of the Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, and for the case that reason undermines every system offered to it.

In tension with

  • Thomas Reid

    Reid accepted that Hume's reasoning was valid and concluded that the shared premise must be false, rejecting the theory of ideas that Descartes, Locke, Berkeley and Hume had all assumed.

  • T.H. Green

    Green's book-length Introductions to Hume's Treatise (1874) mounted a sustained refutation of Hume's empiricism, arguing a self reducible to impressions could neither know nor will — the founding polemic of British Idealism.

Discover your political archetype.

A four-minute assessment across four axes — no account required, no signup, no spam.

Begin the assessment