Globalist Haplotype Rarity: ~3.5% of population

Classical Liberal

You advocate for individual liberty, free markets, and limited government. People should be free to pursue their interests with minimal state interference.

Orientation: Individual rights, free markets, limited government, Enlightenment values

Dimension Scores

Liberty
72
Markets
67
Global
50
Culture
50

Understanding This Type

Classical Liberals ground their politics in Enlightenment principles: individual rights are natural and pre-political, not grants from government; free markets enable voluntary cooperation and prosperity; government exists only to protect rights and should otherwise leave people alone. This is the liberalism of John Locke, Adam Smith, and the American Founders.

The term distinguishes this tradition from modern American "liberalism," which Classical Liberals see as having abandoned individual liberty for statist progressivism. They identify more with the original meaning: skepticism of concentrated power, faith in individual reason and choice, and protection of natural rights against government overreach.

Classical Liberals occupy interesting political terrain. They share libertarian commitment to individual freedom and limited government but are often more comfortable with gradual reform than radical restructuring. They share conservative appreciation for tradition and institutions but reject social conservatism that restricts individual choice. They're liberal in the original sense—neither contemporary left nor right.

The intellectual tradition includes Locke on natural rights, Smith on markets, Mill on liberty, and modern thinkers like Hayek and Friedman. Classical Liberals see themselves as defending principles that made Western prosperity and freedom possible against threats from both progressive statism and nationalist authoritarianism.

At roughly 3.5% of the population, Classical Liberals are found in libertarian-adjacent spaces, economics departments, some business communities, and intellectual circles focused on defending liberal order. They often feel politically homeless—too free-market for progressives, too socially tolerant for conservatives, too institutionalist for populists.

Dimension Analysis

Personal Liberty

72

High personal liberty—this is the core commitment. Individual rights are natural and paramount. Government should protect rights, not restrict them for social engineering. People should be free to live as they choose, associate with whom they wish, and speak their minds.

  • Strong free speech protections—even for offensive views
  • Property rights as extension of self-ownership
  • Personal choices (drugs, lifestyle) not government's business
  • Religious freedom and freedom from religion

Market Economy

67

Pro-market and anti-statist on economics. Free markets coordinate voluntary exchange better than any alternative. Government intervention usually makes things worse. Support property rights, free trade, and market pricing with minimal regulation.

  • Free markets outperform central planning
  • Property rights fundamental to prosperity and freedom
  • Minimal regulation—let markets self-correct
  • Skeptical of welfare state beyond minimal safety net

Global Orientation

50

Moderate on globalism—support free trade and skeptical of nationalism, but also wary of international institutions that expand government power. Cosmopolitan in principle but cautious about global governance.

  • Free trade benefits all parties
  • Nationalism is dangerous but international bureaucracy too
  • Immigration generally positive (free movement of people)
  • Skeptical of international institutions with enforcement power

Cultural Values

50

Moderate on culture—support individual choice on social issues without being culturally progressive activists. People should be free to live traditionally or progressively as they choose. Government shouldn't enforce either.

  • Marriage, family, lifestyle choices are individual decisions
  • Neither enforce tradition nor mandate progressivism
  • Secular on church-state but respect religious liberty
  • Value both Enlightenment progress and inherited wisdom

Core Beliefs

  • Individual rights are natural, not granted by government—they pre-exist the state
  • Free markets coordinate voluntary exchange better than any planning or control
  • Government exists only to protect rights—anything more becomes oppression
  • Property rights are foundation of all rights and source of prosperity
  • Freedom means freedom from coercion, not entitlement to resources
  • The Enlightenment principles of reason, rights, and liberty remain the best foundation for society

Internal Tensions

  • Pure principles vs. practical politics and compromise
  • Free markets vs. real-world monopolies, externalities, and power imbalances
  • Individual liberty vs. communities that transmit values making liberty possible
  • Defending liberal order vs. recognizing its failures and critics' valid points
  • Gradual reform vs. urgency of defending principles under attack

Foundational Thinkers

John Locke

Father of classical liberalism (1632-1704)

Adam Smith

Founder of modern economics (1723-1790)

Friedrich Hayek

Nobel economist on spontaneous order (1899-1992)

Milton Friedman

Chicago economist championing free markets (1912-2006)

John Stuart Mill

Liberal philosopher on liberty and harm principle (1806-1873)

Contemporary Voices

Charles Koch

Billionaire funder of libertarian institutions and Stand Together network

Megan McArdle

Washington Post columnist on markets and liberty

Ayaan Hirsi Ali

Author and critic defending Enlightenment values

Niall Ferguson

Historian defending classical liberal institutions

Johan Norberg

Swedish author on progress and liberty

Communities & Spaces

Reason Magazine readers Web

Classical liberal policy audience

Cato Institute followers Various

Libertarian think tank audience

The Dispatch subscribers Web

Never-Trump classical liberals

Quillette readers Web

Intellectual dark web adjacent

Free speech advocates X/Twitter

First Amendment defenders

Key Institutions

Cato Institute

Leading libertarian think tank in Washington DC

Reason Foundation

Free-market policy research organization

Institute of Economic Affairs (UK)

British classical liberal think tank

Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE)

Free speech advocacy

Atlas Network

Global network of free-market think tanks

How It Compares

vs. Traditional Libertarian (Close Cousins)

Aspect Classical Liberal Traditional Libertarian
Institutions Value gradual reform More radical critique
Culture Neutral/moderate Often conservative
Tradition Respect Enlightenment More varied
Style Intellectual/academic Political/movement

vs. Market Liberal (Market Allies)

Aspect Classical Liberal Market Liberal
Regulation Minimize Smart regulation OK
Safety Net Minimal/skeptical Efficient programs OK
Principles Rights-based Consequentialist
Institutions Skeptical of international Embrace international

vs. Moderate Conservative (Coalition Partners)

Aspect Classical Liberal Moderate Conservative
Social Issues Individual choice Traditional preference
Markets Principled support Pragmatic support
Liberty Core commitment One value among many
Tradition Enlightenment tradition Broader tradition

Common Critiques

Classical liberalism is just cover for plutocracy and corporate power
We oppose concentrations of power—including corporate power when it's propped up by government privilege. True free markets have competition that checks corporate abuse. Crony capitalism, where business captures government, is what we oppose. Don't confuse our position with corporatism.
Individual rights are meaningless without material resources to exercise them
Negative rights (freedom from interference) and positive rights (entitlements to resources) are fundamentally different. We support the former as natural and universal. The latter require taking from some to give to others, which violates rights. Prosperity that enables opportunity comes from free markets, not redistribution.
The Enlightenment tradition produced colonialism, slavery, and exploitation
Enlightenment principles were used to critique and eventually abolish slavery—abolition was a liberal movement. The tradition contains self-correcting capacity: its ideals of universal rights eventually extended to all. Imperfect application doesn't invalidate principles that enabled unprecedented human flourishing.
Classical liberals enabled Trump and right-wing populism
We oppose Trump-style nationalism as much as progressive statism. Populism rose partly because liberal elites ignored legitimate concerns, but Classical Liberals have been consistently critical of protectionism, immigration restriction, and democratic erosion. We're not populist allies.
Markets alone can't solve climate change, pandemics, or collective action problems
Market failures are real and may require intervention—Classical Liberals disagree among themselves on specifics. Property rights can address many externalities. Where government action is needed, it should be minimal and market-compatible (carbon taxes, not command-and-control). We're not anarchists.

Frequently Asked Questions

Significant overlap but some distinctions. Classical Liberals tend to be more intellectual and academic; libertarians more political and movement-oriented. Classical Liberals often accept more gradual reform; libertarians want more radical change. Classical Liberals identify with Enlightenment tradition specifically; libertarian is broader. But many use the terms interchangeably.
In the original meaning, liberal—commitment to liberty, rights, and limited government. In contemporary American usage, neither: they reject progressive economic policies (so not "liberal") and reject social conservatism (so not "conservative"). They're trying to preserve the original liberal tradition against both modern alternatives.
Historical: John Locke, Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, Frederic Bastiat. 20th century: F.A. Hayek, Milton Friedman, Ludwig von Mises. Contemporary: Deirdre McCloskey, Tyler Cowen, Richard Epstein. Institutions include Cato Institute, Institute for Humane Studies, and some economics departments.
Generally very positively—as embodiment of Classical Liberal principles. The Constitution's structure (limited enumerated powers, separation of powers, Bill of Rights) reflects distrust of concentrated government power. Classical Liberals often favor originalist interpretation that maintains these limits against expansive readings.
Individual choice should prevail. Government shouldn't restrict gay marriage, drug use, or lifestyle choices—these are none of the state's business. But government also shouldn't mandate acceptance or use power to enforce progressive cultural views. Neutrality and individual liberty, not taking sides in culture war.

Is This Your Political DNA?

Take the Political DNA Scan to discover your type among 32 distinct political strains.

Take the Quiz →