Conservative Haplotype Rarity: ~2% of population

Traditionalist

You believe individual freedom must yield to community cohesion and traditional values. Strong social bonds and shared morality matter more than personal autonomy.

Orientation: Community bonds, local institutions, ordered liberty

Dimension Scores

Liberty
43
Markets
50
Global
45
Culture
43

Understanding This Type

Traditionalists believe that human flourishing requires rootedness in particular places, communities, and inherited ways of life. Against both progressive universalism and libertarian individualism, they argue that people need thick social bonds, local institutions, and shared moral frameworks—not autonomous choice in an atomized marketplace of lifestyles.

This strain draws on communitarian philosophy, Catholic social teaching (particularly subsidiarity), and conservative thinkers like Russell Kirk, Robert Nisbet, and Wendell Berry. They're skeptical of bigness in all forms—big government, big business, big tech—preferring human-scale institutions where people know each other and share responsibility for common life.

Traditionalists critique both left and right for different failures. Progressives err by using state power to dissolve traditional communities and impose alien values. Libertarians and mainstream conservatives err by celebrating market forces that equally dissolve communities, replacing local businesses with chains, stable families with consumer choice, and rooted citizens with mobile workers.

The emphasis is on what mediates between isolated individuals and distant states: families, churches, neighborhoods, local businesses, voluntary associations, and civic organizations. These "little platoons" (Burke's phrase) form character, transmit values, provide meaning, and create the social trust that makes self-government possible.

At roughly 2% of the population, Traditionalists are a small but intellectually influential strain. They're found in "crunchy con" communities, agrarian and localist movements, traditional religious communities, and among thinkers trying to articulate what's been lost in modern life. They often feel politically homeless—too anti-capitalist for mainstream Republicans, too traditional for Democrats.

Dimension Analysis

Personal Liberty

43

Traditionalists believe liberty must be ordered by community standards and moral tradition. Unconstrained individual choice produces atomization, not flourishing. Freedom means freedom to fulfill one's role in community, not freedom from all constraints.

  • Communities can legitimately maintain standards of behavior
  • Local norms and expectations are features, not bugs
  • Some choices should be discouraged even if not banned
  • Strong families and communities constrain and form individuals

Market Economy

50

Neither free-market nor statist. Traditionalists distrust both corporate capitalism that dissolves communities and government bureaucracy that displaces local institutions. They favor small-scale, local economic arrangements and are skeptical of growth as ultimate goal.

  • Support for local businesses over chains and Amazon
  • Skeptical of economic "efficiency" that destroys community
  • Land use and zoning to preserve community character
  • Suspicious of both Wall Street and Washington

Global Orientation

45

Moderately nationalist but primarily localist. The nation is a community of communities, not a collection of individuals. Skeptical of both global institutions and centralized national power that override local self-determination.

  • Local and state governance preferred over federal
  • Skeptical of free trade that hollows out communities
  • Immigration should be slow enough for assimilation
  • Communities should control their own development

Cultural Values

43

Culturally conservative but focused on preservation rather than crusade. Value inherited traditions, religious practice, and settled ways of life. See rapid cultural change as destabilizing to the social fabric that sustains human flourishing.

  • Traditional family structure as foundation of society
  • Religious practice as source of meaning and community
  • Local customs and traditions worth preserving
  • Skeptical of technology that disrupts human relationships

Core Beliefs

  • Communities require shared sacrifice, mutual obligation, and moral standards to function
  • Radical individualism has destroyed social trust, belonging, and meaning
  • Local institutions—families, churches, civic groups—beat both bureaucracy and market atomization
  • Rootedness in place and tradition is necessary for human flourishing
  • Both big government and big business threaten human-scale community
  • What is nearest is usually most important—subsidiarity should guide politics

Internal Tensions

  • Preserving community vs. accepting that people choose to leave
  • Local control vs. communities that maintain unjust traditions
  • Anti-capitalism vs. recognizing markets enable some goods
  • Nostalgia vs. acknowledging past communities had real problems
  • Small-scale vision vs. scale of modern problems (climate, tech)

Foundational Thinkers

Wendell Berry

Agrarian writer and poet on place and community

Alasdair MacIntyre

Philosopher critiquing liberal individualism

Robert Nisbet

Sociologist on mediating institutions (1913-1996)

Michael Sandel

Harvard philosopher on civic republicanism

Christopher Lasch

Cultural critic of rootless capitalism (1932-1994)

Contemporary Voices

Rusty Reno

First Things editor on post-liberal conservatism

Bill Kauffman

Author on localism and American regionalism

Philip Blond

Red Tory thinker on communitarian conservatism

Matthew Crawford

Author of Shop Class as Soulcraft on manual work

Adrian Vermeule

Harvard law professor on common good constitutionalism

Communities & Spaces

Front Porch Republic readers Web

Localism and limits discourse

New Urbanism forums Various

Walkable communities advocacy

Wendell Berry readers Various

Agrarian conservatism community

Benedict Option networks Various

Intentional Christian community

Crunchy con spaces Various

Countercultural conservatives

Key Institutions

Front Porch Republic

Localist, place-based conservatism publication

Intercollegiate Studies Institute

Traditional conservative education

American Conservative

Magazine promoting communitarian conservatism

Institute for Family Studies

Research on family and community

Communio journal

Catholic theological journal on community

How It Compares

vs. Religious Conservative (Natural Ally)

Aspect Traditionalist Religious Conservative
Foundation Natural community Religious revelation
Scope Local/particular Universal truths
Focus Social bonds Moral law
Politics Defensive/preservationist Transformational

vs. National Conservative (Friendly Neighbor)

Aspect Traditionalist National Conservative
Scale Local/regional National
Politics Often apolitical Active engagement
Economics Small-scale skeptic Strategic nationalist
State Suspicious of all levels Use national power

vs. Left Libertarian (Strange Bedfellow)

Aspect Traditionalist Left Libertarian
Culture Traditional Progressive
Community Inherited/given Chosen/voluntary
Property Family farms, local shops Worker collectives
Common Enemy Corporate capitalism Corporate capitalism

Common Critiques

Traditionalism is just nostalgia for a past that excluded women, minorities, and LGBTQ people
Traditional communities had real flaws and injustices. But the answer isn't atomized individualism—it's better communities. Human need for belonging, meaning, and mutual obligation is universal. We can have inclusive communities that still provide rootedness and shared moral life.
You can't stop change—technology and markets evolve inevitably
Communities make choices about which changes to embrace and which to resist. The Amish demonstrate this. "Inevitability" is often an excuse for not examining who benefits from change. We can be selective about technology and economic arrangements rather than passively accepting whatever comes.
Local communities can be oppressive—sometimes people need to escape
True, and exit rights matter. But the solution isn't to dissolve all communities into isolated individuals. The goal is communities that are good to belong to, not the abolition of belonging. Most people need somewhere to be from, not just somewhere to escape to.
This vision is impractical in a globalized, mobile, technological society
The question is whether that society is producing human flourishing. Loneliness, depression, and deaths of despair suggest it isn't. Traditionalist ideals may be aspirational, but they point toward what's missing. Even partial movement toward community and rootedness would help.
Who decides what traditions are worth preserving? This sounds authoritarian.
Communities decide through ongoing practice and deliberation—that's how tradition works. It's not about authoritarian imposition but organic inheritance and adaptation. Traditions that no one wants to maintain will fade; those that serve human needs will persist.

Frequently Asked Questions

Mainstream conservatism (especially since Reagan) celebrates free markets, individual liberty, and economic growth. Traditionalists are skeptical of all three when they dissolve community bonds. They're more communitarian, more localist, more skeptical of capitalism, and less interested in national politics than movement conservatism.
Neither neatly. Traditionalists share conservative concern for family, religion, and inherited ways of life. But they share leftist skepticism of capitalism, corporate power, and market values. They're often politically homeless—"crunchy cons," "red Tories," or just disengaged from partisan politics.
More local food systems, small businesses instead of chains, walkable communities where people know neighbors, strong churches and civic organizations, multi-generational households, less screen time and more face-to-face interaction, and governance decisions made at the most local level possible.
Revealed preferences are shaped by available options. When chains drive out local shops, there's no local shop to prefer. When everyone works 50 hours, there's no time for civic life. Community didn't decline because people rejected it—it was undermined by economic and policy choices that could be made differently.
Russell Kirk (The Conservative Mind), Robert Nisbet (The Quest for Community), Wendell Berry (agrarian essays), Alasdair MacIntyre (After Virtue), Rod Dreher ("crunchy cons" and The Benedict Option), Patrick Deneen (Why Liberalism Failed), and the Front Porch Republic website and community.

Is This Your Political DNA?

Take the Political DNA Scan to discover your type among 32 distinct political strains.

Take the Quiz →