Globalist Haplotype Rarity: ~3.5% of population

Market Liberal

You champion free trade, open borders, and international institutions. Global markets and cooperation create prosperity while nationalism breeds conflict.

Orientation: Free trade, open borders, international institutions, evidence-based policy (also known as neoliberal)

Dimension Scores

Liberty
50
Markets
67
Global
67
Culture
50

Understanding This Type

Neoliberals believe that free markets, open borders, and international cooperation create prosperity and peace better than any alternative. They champion the post-World War II liberal order: free trade agreements, institutions like the WTO and NATO, immigration that enriches receiving countries, and evidence-based policy that lets data rather than ideology guide decisions.

The term "neoliberal" is used pejoratively by critics on both left and right, but a community has embraced it positively—particularly online through forums like the Neoliberal subreddit and podcast. They see themselves as defending successful policies against populist attacks from Trump-style nationalism and Bernie-style socialism alike.

Core to neoliberalism is faith in markets—not laissez-faire fundamentalism, but recognition that voluntary exchange and price signals coordinate economic activity more effectively than central direction. Markets have failures that require correction (externalities, public goods, information asymmetries), but the baseline should be market allocation with targeted intervention.

On social issues, neoliberals are broadly progressive: supportive of LGBTQ+ rights, racial equality, and cosmopolitan diversity. They see social liberalism as complement to economic liberalism—both expand human freedom and flourishing. But they're uncomfortable with progressive economic positions they view as poorly designed or counterproductive.

At roughly 3.5% of the population, Neoliberals are concentrated among educated professionals, economists, and the bipartisan policy establishment. They're influential in think tanks, economics departments, and center-left/center-right parties worldwide. Critics see them as defenders of a failing status quo; supporters see them as evidence-driven pragmatists in an age of populist fantasy.

Dimension Analysis

Personal Liberty

50

Moderate on personal liberty—Neoliberals support individual freedom but accept regulation where markets fail or rights conflict. Neither libertarian purists nor statist controllers, they take a pragmatic case-by-case approach.

  • Support civil liberties and personal autonomy
  • Accept regulation for market failures and externalities
  • Evidence-based drug policy (decriminalization, treatment)
  • Free speech valued but platform moderation acceptable

Market Economy

67

Pro-market with smart regulation. Markets are the best mechanism for most allocation, but require rules to function and intervention to correct failures. Support free trade, competition, and market pricing with appropriate safety nets and public goods.

  • Free trade agreements benefit all parties over time
  • Carbon pricing over command-and-control climate policy
  • Occupational licensing reform to reduce barriers
  • YIMBY housing policy—let markets build

Global Orientation

67

Strongly internationalist—believe in open borders, free trade, and international institutions. Global cooperation creates prosperity; nationalism breeds conflict and poverty. The liberal international order is an achievement worth defending.

  • Support dramatically increased immigration
  • Free trade lifts all boats—defend against protectionism
  • NATO, WTO, and international institutions are valuable
  • Cosmopolitan identity over national particularism

Cultural Values

50

Moderate-to-progressive on culture—support social liberalism, diversity, and inclusion while being skeptical of some progressive cultural politics. Focus is on policy outcomes rather than cultural battles.

  • Support LGBTQ+ rights, racial equality, feminism
  • Value diversity and cosmopolitan culture
  • Skeptical of some "woke" positions as counterproductive
  • Cultural issues less central than economic policy

Core Beliefs

  • Free trade lifts all boats—protectionism hurts the poor most, both domestically and globally
  • Immigration is both economic and moral imperative—people should be free to move and work
  • NATO, WTO, and liberal international order prevent war and enable prosperity
  • Evidence should guide policy—let data, not ideology, determine what works
  • Markets with good rules outperform both laissez-faire and central planning
  • Incremental reform beats revolutionary change—progress is real but gradual

Internal Tensions

  • Market faith vs. recognizing serious market failures (inequality, climate)
  • Globalization benefits vs. real costs to specific communities
  • Elite consensus vs. democratic legitimacy when voters disagree
  • Incremental reform vs. urgency of problems like climate change
  • Technocratic expertise vs. values that can't be quantified

Foundational Thinkers

Francis Fukuyama

Author of The End of History on liberal democratic triumph

Joseph Nye

Harvard scholar on soft power and liberal order

Anne-Marie Slaughter

International relations scholar on networked world

Jagdish Bhagwati

Columbia economist defending free trade

Thomas Friedman

New York Times columnist on globalization

Contemporary Voices

Tony Blair

Former UK PM embodying Third Way globalism

Emmanuel Macron

French President defending liberal internationalism

Larry Summers

Former Treasury Secretary and economist

Janet Yellen

Treasury Secretary and Fed chair

Christine Lagarde

ECB President and former IMF chief

Communities & Spaces

r/neoliberal Reddit

Ironic then sincere globalist subreddit

The Economist readers Web

Elite consensus audience

Davos attendee networks Various

Global elite gatherings

Foreign Policy magazine readers Web

International affairs audience

Think tank professional networks Various

Policy wonk spaces

Key Institutions

Brookings Institution

Centrist think tank on foreign policy and economics

Council on Foreign Relations

Elite foreign policy organization

Peterson Institute for International Economics

Free trade research

Atlantic Council

NATO-aligned foreign policy think tank

World Economic Forum

Davos-based global elite gathering

How It Compares

vs. National Populist (Primary Opponents)

Aspect Market Liberal National Populist
Trade Free trade Protectionist
Immigration Open borders Restrict heavily
Institutions Defend/strengthen Skeptical/oppose
Elites Expertise valuable Corrupt establishment

vs. Progressive Activist (Cultural Allies, Economic Skeptics)

Aspect Market Liberal Progressive Activist
Markets Generally good Often problematic
Capitalism Best system available Needs transformation
Trade Free trade good Conditional/skeptical
Change Incremental Urgent/structural

vs. Classical Liberal (Ideological Cousins)

Aspect Market Liberal Classical Liberal
Regulation Smart regulation good Minimize all
Safety Net Efficient programs OK Skeptical of welfare
Intervention For market failures Almost never
Institutions International valued More skeptical

Common Critiques

Neoliberalism has failed—it produced inequality, financial crises, and climate change
The era of globalization also produced the greatest poverty reduction in human history, rising living standards globally, and (until recently) declining interstate conflict. Problems exist, but the counterfactual—protectionism, closed borders, weakened institutions—would be worse. We need better neoliberalism, not abandonment.
You're just shills for corporations and the wealthy
We support policies that help the poor: free trade that raises developing world living standards, immigration that lets people escape poverty, competitive markets that reduce prices. Corporate interests often oppose free trade and competition. Our agenda isn't corporate—it's pro-prosperity.
Technocratic elitism ignores democratic will and real suffering
We believe in democracy and take suffering seriously—that's why we want policies that actually work. Sometimes voters support policies that hurt them (protectionism costs jobs; immigration restriction hurts growth). Expertise should inform democratic choice, not replace it.
Open borders would destroy social cohesion and overwhelm receiving countries
Research shows immigration benefits receiving countries economically with minimal negative effects on native workers. Social cohesion concerns are real but manageable with integration support. Completely open borders is aspirational; dramatically more immigration is achievable and beneficial.
"Evidence-based policy" is just your ideology dressed up as science
We're willing to change views when evidence changes. The empirical case for free trade is as strong as any in economics. We supported and then abandoned some positions (harsh criminal justice) as evidence accumulated. That's what evidence-based means—not certainty, but updateable beliefs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Both. Critics use it as an epithet for market-friendly policies they oppose. But a community has reclaimed the term to describe their actual views: pro-market, pro-trade, pro-immigration, evidence-based. The self-identified neoliberal community exists primarily online (r/neoliberal, podcasts, blogs) and among policy professionals.
Libertarians want to minimize government in principle. Neoliberals accept significant government role for market failures, public goods, and safety nets—they just want government to be efficient and market-compatible. Neoliberals support carbon taxes, some redistribution, and international institutions that libertarians often oppose.
Neither cleanly. On economics, they're center-right (pro-market, pro-trade). On social issues, they're center-left (progressive on LGBTQ+, race, immigration). They're comfortable in the wings of both major parties and often describe themselves as "radical centrists" or "extreme moderates." The label-defying position is intentional.
Neoliberals exist in both parties but are increasingly squeezed out. Clinton-era Democrats and Bush-era Republicans had neoliberal elements. The parties' populist turns (Trump, Sanders/Warren wing) have marginalized them. They're often "Never Trump" Republicans or Biden-style Democrats uncomfortable with progressive economics.
Yes! This phrase—from a Trump surrogate warning about immigration—was embraced as neoliberal aspiration. It represents the benefits of immigration (cultural diversity, entrepreneurship, delicious food) and cosmopolitan openness. "Taco trucks on every corner" is now a semi-ironic neoliberal slogan.

Is This Your Political DNA?

Take the Political DNA Scan to discover your type among 32 distinct political strains.

Take the Quiz →