[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"archetype-name-map":3,"tradition-physiocracy":100},[4,7,10,13,16,19,22,25,28,31,34,37,40,43,46,49,52,55,58,61,64,67,70,73,76,79,82,85,88,91,94,97],{"slug":5,"name":6},"establishment-progressive","Establishment Progressive",{"slug":8,"name":9},"conservative-democrat","Conservative Democrat",{"slug":11,"name":12},"moderate-conservative","Moderate Conservative",{"slug":14,"name":15},"reform-conservative","Reform Conservative",{"slug":17,"name":18},"national-populist","National Populist",{"slug":20,"name":21},"left-nationalist","Left Nationalist",{"slug":23,"name":24},"compassionate-libertarian","Compassionate Libertarian",{"slug":26,"name":27},"left-libertarian","Left Libertarian",{"slug":29,"name":30},"democratic-socialist","Democratic Socialist",{"slug":32,"name":33},"market-liberal","Market Liberal",{"slug":35,"name":36},"anarcho-capitalist","Anarcho-Capitalist",{"slug":38,"name":39},"progressive-activist","Progressive Activist",{"slug":41,"name":42},"techno-progressive","Techno-Progressive",{"slug":44,"name":45},"patriotic-progressive","Patriotic Progressive",{"slug":47,"name":48},"religious-conservative","Religious Conservative",{"slug":50,"name":51},"traditionalist","Traditionalist",{"slug":53,"name":54},"moderate-liberal","Moderate Liberal",{"slug":56,"name":57},"pragmatic-centrist","Pragmatic Centrist",{"slug":59,"name":60},"authoritarian-left","Authoritarian Left",{"slug":62,"name":63},"authoritarian-right","Authoritarian Right",{"slug":65,"name":66},"welfare-nationalist","Welfare Nationalist",{"slug":68,"name":69},"christian-socialist","Christian Socialist",{"slug":71,"name":72},"market-socialist","Market Socialist",{"slug":74,"name":75},"trad-socialist","Trad Socialist",{"slug":77,"name":78},"civil-libertarian","Civil Libertarian",{"slug":80,"name":81},"traditional-libertarian","Traditional Libertarian",{"slug":83,"name":84},"social-liberal","Social Liberal",{"slug":86,"name":87},"national-conservative","National Conservative",{"slug":89,"name":90},"neoconservative","Neoconservative",{"slug":92,"name":93},"techno-authoritarian","Techno-Authoritarian",{"slug":95,"name":96},"independent-thinker","Independent Thinker",{"slug":98,"name":99},"classical-liberal","Classical Liberal",{"tradition":101,"thinkers":108,"definingArchetypes":129,"sharedArchetypes":130,"relOut":131,"relIn":144},{"id":102,"slug":103,"name":104,"short_description":105,"long_description":106,"era_marker":107},492,"physiocracy","Physiocracy","The first systematic school of economics: that land and agriculture alone create new wealth, that the economy is a circulating natural order, and that government should therefore let it alone.","Physiocracy was the first attempt to describe an economy as a system rather than a policy problem, and the first to draw the conclusion that it should mostly be left alone.\n\nQuesnay, physician to Louis XV, built the Tableau économique (1758) as a circulation diagram in the manner of the blood: value moves between the productive class of cultivators, the proprietors, and the \"sterile\" class of artisans and merchants, who transform matter without adding to the total. Only land yields a produit net — a surplus over the cost of production — so agriculture is the sole source of new wealth, and all taxation should fall on the landowner in a single tax, every other levy being merely passed along.\n\nThe economics is wrong and the method is decisive. Treating the economy as an interdependent circular flow, with equilibrium conditions and a reproducible surplus, is the move that makes economics a science, and both Marx and the input-output tradition acknowledged the Tableau as an ancestor.\n\nThe politics is \"legal despotism\": a sovereign undivided in power but wholly bound by a natural order he does not author and cannot alter. This is where the school's famous slogan comes from — laissez faire, laissez passer — and where its interest in China comes in. Quesnay read the Jesuit accounts as evidence that a great empire had already been governed on these principles for millennia, and Le Despotisme de la Chine (1767) made the argument at length; contemporaries called him the Confucius of Europe. Turgot, as controller-general, briefly attempted the program in office and was destroyed by the resistance.","18th century",[109,121],{"is_primary":110,"thinkers":111},false,{"id":112,"era":113,"name":114,"slug":115,"one_line":116,"is_living":110,"birth_year":117,"death_year":118,"portrait_url":119,"sort_priority":120},1184,"Enlightenment","François Quesnay","francois-quesnay","Court physician who founded the Physiocrats, drew the first model of an economy as a circular flow, and gave laissez-faire its program.",1694,1774,null,5,{"is_primary":110,"thinkers":122},{"id":123,"era":113,"name":124,"slug":125,"one_line":126,"is_living":110,"birth_year":127,"death_year":128,"portrait_url":119,"sort_priority":120},1185,"Anne-Robert-Jacques Turgot","anne-robert-jacques-turgot","Controller-General who tried to reform France out of its crisis and was dismissed in twenty months, and who wrote the first clear statement of history as indefinite progress.",1727,1781,[],[],[132,140],{"relation_type":133,"strength":134,"description":135,"traditions":136},"descends_from","significant","The Tableau was built to answer the mercantile system on its own ground, and takes from it the premise it then inverts: that a nation's wealth is a definite quantity policy can be held responsible for.",{"name":137,"slug":138,"era_marker":139},"Mercantilism","mercantilism","16th to 18th century",{"relation_type":141,"strength":134,"description":142,"traditions":143},"reacts_against","The Physiocrats held that Colbert had beggared French agriculture to subsidize manufactures, mistaking treasure for wealth and the sterile class for the productive one.",{"name":137,"slug":138,"era_marker":139},[145],{"relation_type":133,"strength":146,"description":147,"traditions":148},"foundational","Smith met Quesnay in Paris and meant to dedicate the Wealth of Nations to him; the circular flow, the produit net and laissez faire all pass into classical economics even as the exclusive productivity of land is discarded.",{"name":149,"slug":150,"era_marker":151},"Political Economy","political-economy","18th century to present"]