[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"archetype-name-map":3,"thinker-nathan-schneider":100},[4,7,10,13,16,19,22,25,28,31,34,37,40,43,46,49,52,55,58,61,64,67,70,73,76,79,82,85,88,91,94,97],{"slug":5,"name":6},"anarcho-capitalist","Anarcho-Capitalist",{"slug":8,"name":9},"establishment-progressive","Establishment Progressive",{"slug":11,"name":12},"progressive-activist","Progressive Activist",{"slug":14,"name":15},"techno-progressive","Techno-Progressive",{"slug":17,"name":18},"patriotic-progressive","Patriotic Progressive",{"slug":20,"name":21},"conservative-democrat","Conservative Democrat",{"slug":23,"name":24},"moderate-conservative","Moderate Conservative",{"slug":26,"name":27},"reform-conservative","Reform Conservative",{"slug":29,"name":30},"religious-conservative","Religious Conservative",{"slug":32,"name":33},"traditionalist","Traditionalist",{"slug":35,"name":36},"national-populist","National Populist",{"slug":38,"name":39},"left-nationalist","Left Nationalist",{"slug":41,"name":42},"welfare-nationalist","Welfare Nationalist",{"slug":44,"name":45},"moderate-liberal","Moderate Liberal",{"slug":47,"name":48},"pragmatic-centrist","Pragmatic Centrist",{"slug":50,"name":51},"authoritarian-left","Authoritarian Left",{"slug":53,"name":54},"authoritarian-right","Authoritarian Right",{"slug":56,"name":57},"democratic-socialist","Democratic Socialist",{"slug":59,"name":60},"christian-socialist","Christian Socialist",{"slug":62,"name":63},"market-socialist","Market Socialist",{"slug":65,"name":66},"trad-socialist","Trad Socialist",{"slug":68,"name":69},"civil-libertarian","Civil Libertarian",{"slug":71,"name":72},"compassionate-libertarian","Compassionate Libertarian",{"slug":74,"name":75},"left-libertarian","Left Libertarian",{"slug":77,"name":78},"traditional-libertarian","Traditional Libertarian",{"slug":80,"name":81},"classical-liberal","Classical Liberal",{"slug":83,"name":84},"social-liberal","Social Liberal",{"slug":86,"name":87},"national-conservative","National Conservative",{"slug":89,"name":90},"neoconservative","Neoconservative",{"slug":92,"name":93},"techno-authoritarian","Techno-Authoritarian",{"slug":95,"name":96},"independent-thinker","Independent Thinker",{"slug":98,"name":99},"market-liberal","Market Liberal",{"thinker":101,"archetypes":120,"traditions":124},{"id":102,"slug":103,"name":104,"sort_name":105,"birth_year":106,"death_year":107,"nationality":107,"era":107,"one_line":108,"bio":109,"portrait_url":107,"has_portrait":110,"sort_priority":111,"is_living":112,"created_at":113,"updated_at":114,"search_vector":115,"primary_role":116,"secondary_roles":117,"notable_quotes":118,"historical_tensions":119,"plcf_score":107,"mesr_score":107,"dipg_score":107,"cult_score":107,"figure_descriptor":107,"figure_class":107,"editorial_review":112},891,"nathan-schneider","Nathan Schneider","Schneider, Nathan",1984,null,"Nathan Schneider is a cooperativist scholar of economic democracy who champions collective ownership of digital platforms as an alternative to extractive, shareholder-owned tech capitalism","Nathan Schneider is an American scholar and journalist whose work explores how democratic and cooperative principles might be applied to the digital economy and to online life more broadly. Based at the University of Colorado Boulder, where he teaches media studies, he became widely known through his reporting on and analysis of the Occupy Wall Street movement, chronicling its experiments in horizontal, leaderless decision-making and its ambivalent relationship to formal political structures. That interest in participatory, non-hierarchical organization has remained a through-line in his thought, connecting contemporary movements to older traditions of self-governance, mutual aid, and economic democracy.\n\nSchneider is most closely associated with the idea of \"platform cooperativism,\" a framework he helped articulate and popularize alongside Trebor Scholz. The argument holds that the dominant model of digital platforms—venture-funded, shareholder-owned, and reliant on extracting value from users and workers—is neither inevitable nor the only workable design. As an alternative, platform cooperativism proposes that the people who use and labor on a platform might collectively own and govern it, drawing on the long history of the cooperative movement. This positions Schneider within a lineage of economic democracy and cooperativism that predates the internet, and reframes debates about the tech industry as questions of ownership, accountability, and power rather than merely of regulation or antitrust.\n\nHis broader writing engages the history of cooperative enterprise and other forms of shared ownership, arguing that such traditions represent an under-recognized and practically viable strand of economic organization capable of shaping a more equitable future. He has also turned his attention to questions of online governance, examining how digital communities are typically structured around unaccountable, quasi-authoritarian administration and asking how principles of democratic self-rule might instead be built into the design of digital spaces. Across these projects, Schneider situates himself in dialogue with anarchist, communitarian, and cooperative currents, while remaining pragmatically focused on institutional design and real-world experiments.\n\nSchneider's influence lies less in a single systematic theory than in helping to consolidate a vocabulary and a movement. By linking activist experience, journalistic observation, and scholarship, he has encouraged technologists, organizers, and policymakers to treat ownership and governance as central political questions of the digital age, and to view cooperatives as living precedents rather than historical curiosities.",false,5,true,"2026-05-04T20:40:51.368746+00:00","2026-07-09T03:53:27.810379+00:00","'account':246C 'across':337C 'activist':385C 'administr':317C 'age':410C 'aid':131C 'alongsid':153C 'also':296C 'altern':21B,191C 'ambival':97C 'american':33C 'analysi':79C 'anarchist':346C 'antitrust':255C 'appli':47C 'argu':271C 'argument':157C 'around':312C 'articul':150C 'ask':319C 'associ':139C 'attent':299C 'authoritarian':316C 'base':58C 'becam':71C 'boulder':64C 'broad':57C 'broader':257C 'built':330C 'capabl':287C 'capit':28B 'central':404C 'champion':13B 'chronicl':86C 'close':138C 'collect':14B,206C 'colorado':63C 'communitarian':347C 'communiti':308C 'connect':120C 'consolid':377C 'contemporari':121C 'cooper':43C,218C,263C,349C,414C 'cooperativ':145C,193C,230C 'cooperativist':7B 'curios':421C 'current':350C 'debat':237C 'decis':93C 'decision-mak':92C 'democraci':11B,134C,228C 'democrat':41C,323C 'design':188C,333C,357C 'dialogu':344C 'digit':17B,50C,164C,307C,335C,409C 'domin':161C 'draw':211C 'econom':10B,133C,227C,285C 'economi':51C 'encourag':393C 'engag':259C 'enterpris':264C 'equit':292C 'examin':305C 'experi':88C,362C,386C 'explor':39C 'extract':23B,175C 'focus':354C 'form':267C 'formal':100C 'framework':147C 'fund':168C 'futur':293C 'govern':129C,209C,304C,402C 'help':149C,375C 'hierarch':109C 'histor':420C 'histori':215C,261C 'hold':158C 'horizont':90C 'idea':142C 'industri':241C 'inevit':183C 'influenc':365C 'instead':328C 'institut':356C 'interest':104C 'internet':234C 'journalist':36C,387C 'known':73C 'labor':201C 'leaderless':91C 'less':367C 'lie':366C 'life':55C 'line':116C 'lineag':225C 'link':384C 'live':416C 'long':214C 'make':94C 'media':68C 'mere':251C 'might':45C,205C,327C 'model':162C 'movement':85C,122C,219C,382C 'mutual':130C 'nathan':1A,3B,29C 'neither':182C 'non':108C 'non-hierarch':107C 'observ':388C 'occupi':82C 'older':124C 'onlin':54C,303C 'organ':110C,286C,395C 'own':26B,171C 'ownership':15B,245C,270C,400C 'participatori':106C 'peopl':197C 'platform':18B,144C,165C,192C,204C 'policymak':397C 'polit':101C,405C 'popular':152C 'posit':221C 'power':248C 'practic':281C 'pragmat':353C 'preced':417C 'predat':232C 'principl':44C,321C 'project':339C 'propos':194C 'quasi':315C 'quasi-authoritarian':314C 'question':243C,301C,406C 'rather':249C,418C 'real':360C 'real-world':359C 'recogn':279C 'refram':236C 'regul':253C 'relationship':98C 'reliant':173C 'remain':112C,352C 'report':76C 'repres':275C 'rule':326C 'schneider':2A,4B,30C,135C,222C,340C,363C 'scholar':8B,34C 'scholarship':390C 'scholz':155C 'self':128C,325C 'self-govern':127C 'self-rul':324C 'shape':289C 'share':269C 'sharehold':25B,170C 'shareholder-own':24B,169C 'singl':370C 'situat':341C 'space':336C 'strand':283C 'street':84C 'structur':102C,311C 'studi':69C 'systemat':371C 'teach':67C 'tech':27B,240C 'technologist':394C 'theori':372C 'thought':119C 'through-lin':114C 'tradit':125C,274C 'treat':399C 'trebor':154C 'turn':297C 'typic':310C 'unaccount':313C 'under-recogn':277C 'univers':61C 'use':199C 'user':178C 'valu':176C 'ventur':167C 'venture-fund':166C 'viabl':282C 'view':413C 'vocabulari':379C 'wall':83C 'whose':37C 'wide':72C 'within':223C 'work':38C 'workabl':187C 'worker':180C 'world':361C 'write':258C","academic",[],[],[],[121],{"archetype_slug":62,"strength":122,"description":123},8,"When the platforms extract from the very users who make them valuable, you don't want them regulated so much as owned — by those users, cooperatively. Schneider calls that platform cooperativism, the digital edge of the economic democracy you already believe in.",[]]