[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"archetype-name-map":3,"thinker-david-frum":100},[4,7,10,13,16,19,22,25,28,31,34,37,40,43,46,49,52,55,58,61,64,67,70,73,76,79,82,85,88,91,94,97],{"slug":5,"name":6},"anarcho-capitalist","Anarcho-Capitalist",{"slug":8,"name":9},"establishment-progressive","Establishment Progressive",{"slug":11,"name":12},"progressive-activist","Progressive Activist",{"slug":14,"name":15},"techno-progressive","Techno-Progressive",{"slug":17,"name":18},"patriotic-progressive","Patriotic Progressive",{"slug":20,"name":21},"conservative-democrat","Conservative Democrat",{"slug":23,"name":24},"moderate-conservative","Moderate Conservative",{"slug":26,"name":27},"reform-conservative","Reform Conservative",{"slug":29,"name":30},"religious-conservative","Religious Conservative",{"slug":32,"name":33},"traditionalist","Traditionalist",{"slug":35,"name":36},"national-populist","National Populist",{"slug":38,"name":39},"left-nationalist","Left Nationalist",{"slug":41,"name":42},"welfare-nationalist","Welfare Nationalist",{"slug":44,"name":45},"moderate-liberal","Moderate Liberal",{"slug":47,"name":48},"pragmatic-centrist","Pragmatic Centrist",{"slug":50,"name":51},"authoritarian-left","Authoritarian Left",{"slug":53,"name":54},"authoritarian-right","Authoritarian Right",{"slug":56,"name":57},"democratic-socialist","Democratic Socialist",{"slug":59,"name":60},"christian-socialist","Christian Socialist",{"slug":62,"name":63},"market-socialist","Market Socialist",{"slug":65,"name":66},"trad-socialist","Trad Socialist",{"slug":68,"name":69},"civil-libertarian","Civil Libertarian",{"slug":71,"name":72},"compassionate-libertarian","Compassionate Libertarian",{"slug":74,"name":75},"left-libertarian","Left Libertarian",{"slug":77,"name":78},"traditional-libertarian","Traditional Libertarian",{"slug":80,"name":81},"classical-liberal","Classical Liberal",{"slug":83,"name":84},"social-liberal","Social Liberal",{"slug":86,"name":87},"national-conservative","National Conservative",{"slug":89,"name":90},"neoconservative","Neoconservative",{"slug":92,"name":93},"techno-authoritarian","Techno-Authoritarian",{"slug":95,"name":96},"independent-thinker","Independent Thinker",{"slug":98,"name":99},"market-liberal","Market Liberal",{"thinker":101,"archetypes":122,"traditions":126},{"id":102,"slug":103,"name":104,"sort_name":105,"birth_year":106,"death_year":107,"nationality":107,"era":107,"one_line":108,"bio":109,"portrait_url":107,"has_portrait":110,"sort_priority":111,"is_living":112,"created_at":113,"updated_at":114,"search_vector":115,"primary_role":116,"secondary_roles":117,"notable_quotes":118,"historical_tensions":119,"plcf_score":107,"mesr_score":107,"dipg_score":107,"cult_score":107,"figure_descriptor":120,"figure_class":121,"editorial_review":112},802,"david-frum","David Frum","Frum, David",1960,null,"David Frum is a conservative by conviction who moved from Bush-era hawkishness to become one of the most visible Never-Trump critics of the American right","David Frum is a Canadian-American writer and commentator whose career traces the intellectual evolution of Anglo-American conservatism from the late Cold War era into the age of Donald Trump. Trained as a journalist and long associated with conservative publications, Frum came to public prominence as a speechwriter in the George W. Bush administration, where he is widely credited with contributing to the language framing the post-9\u002F11 foreign policy that cast certain hostile regimes as a threatening alliance. This period reflected his affinity for a muscular, interventionist conservatism grounded in the belief that American power could and should advance democratic and liberal-order ends abroad.\n\nAcross his writing Frum has argued that conservatism must remain intellectually serious, economically literate, and responsive to the material concerns of ordinary voters rather than captive to ideological slogans. He became a notable internal critic of the Republican Party in the years after Bush, warning that the movement was drifting toward populist grievance, media-driven anger, and a refusal to compromise or govern. This stance made him a controversial figure on the right, as he pressed fellow conservatives to reckon with the party's direction and to adapt policy to changing social realities rather than retreat into rigid orthodoxy.\n\nFrum's most defining political turn came with the rise of Donald Trump, whom he opposed forcefully as a staff writer at The Atlantic. He framed Trumpism as a threat not merely to conservative principles but to constitutional norms and democratic institutions, and he became one of the most visible \"Never-Trump\" conservative voices, arguing that liberal democracy depends on guardrails, restraint, and the willingness of elites to defend institutional integrity. His warnings about the fragility of democratic systems and the appeal of authoritarian-style populism form a recurring theme in his commentary.\n\nAs a thinker, Frum occupies a distinctive position: a conservative by conviction who has become a sharp analyst of the American right's transformation, addressing audiences across the political spectrum. His influence lies less in a single systematic doctrine than in his sustained effort to define what a responsible, governing conservatism might look like, and in his insistence that defending democratic norms should take priority over partisan loyalty. He remains a prolific essayist and public interlocutor on the direction of conservatism and the health of liberal democracy.",false,5,true,"2026-05-04T20:40:51.368746+00:00","2026-07-09T03:53:21.414744+00:00","'-9':102C '\u002F11':103C 'abroad':142C 'across':143C,364C 'adapt':231C 'address':362C 'administr':88C 'advanc':135C 'affin':119C 'age':61C 'allianc':114C 'american':30B,38C,51C,130C,358C 'analyst':355C 'anger':199C 'anglo':50C 'anglo-american':49C 'appeal':325C 'argu':148C,298C 'associ':71C 'atlant':266C 'audienc':363C 'authoritarian':328C 'authoritarian-styl':327C 'becam':173C,287C 'becom':18B,352C 'belief':128C 'bush':14B,87C,186C 'bush-era':13B 'came':76C,249C 'canadian':37C 'canadian-american':36C 'captiv':168C 'career':43C 'cast':107C 'certain':108C 'chang':234C 'cold':56C 'comment':41C 'commentari':337C 'compromis':204C 'concern':162C 'conserv':7B,73C,221C,276C,296C,347C 'conservat':52C,124C,150C,388C,418C 'constitut':280C 'contribut':95C 'controversi':212C 'convict':9B,349C 'could':132C 'credit':93C 'critic':27B,177C 'david':1A,3B,32C 'defend':312C,397C 'defin':246C,383C 'democraci':301C,424C 'democrat':136C,283C,321C,398C 'depend':302C 'direct':228C,416C 'distinct':344C 'doctrin':376C 'donald':63C,254C 'drift':192C 'driven':198C 'econom':155C 'effort':381C 'elit':310C 'end':141C 'era':15B,58C 'essayist':410C 'evolut':47C 'fellow':220C 'figur':213C 'forc':259C 'foreign':104C 'form':331C 'fragil':319C 'frame':99C,268C 'frum':2A,4B,33C,75C,146C,243C,341C 'georg':85C 'govern':206C,387C 'grievanc':195C 'ground':125C 'guardrail':304C 'hawkish':16B 'health':421C 'hostil':109C 'ideolog':170C 'influenc':369C 'insist':395C 'institut':284C,313C 'integr':314C 'intellectu':46C,153C 'interlocutor':413C 'intern':176C 'interventionist':123C 'journalist':68C 'languag':98C 'late':55C 'less':371C 'liber':139C,300C,423C 'liberal-ord':138C 'lie':370C 'like':391C 'liter':156C 'long':70C 'look':390C 'loyalti':405C 'made':209C 'materi':161C 'media':197C 'media-driven':196C 'mere':274C 'might':389C 'move':11B 'movement':190C 'muscular':122C 'must':151C 'never':25B,294C 'never-trump':24B,293C 'norm':281C,399C 'notabl':175C 'occupi':342C 'one':19B,288C 'oppos':258C 'order':140C 'ordinari':164C 'orthodoxi':242C 'parti':181C,226C 'partisan':404C 'period':116C 'polici':105C,232C 'polit':247C,366C 'popul':330C 'populist':194C 'posit':345C 'post':101C 'power':131C 'press':219C 'principl':277C 'prioriti':402C 'prolif':409C 'promin':79C 'public':74C,78C,412C 'rather':166C,237C 'realiti':236C 'reckon':223C 'recur':333C 'reflect':117C 'refus':202C 'regim':110C 'remain':152C,407C 'republican':180C 'respons':158C,386C 'restraint':305C 'retreat':239C 'right':31B,216C,359C 'rigid':241C 'rise':252C 'serious':154C 'sharp':354C 'singl':374C 'slogan':171C 'social':235C 'spectrum':367C 'speechwrit':82C 'staff':262C 'stanc':208C 'style':329C 'sustain':380C 'system':322C 'systemat':375C 'take':401C 'theme':334C 'thinker':340C 'threat':272C 'threaten':113C 'toward':193C 'trace':44C 'train':65C 'transform':361C 'trump':26B,64C,255C,295C 'trumpism':269C 'turn':248C 'visibl':23B,292C 'voic':297C 'voter':165C 'w':86C 'war':57C 'warn':187C,316C 'whose':42C 'wide':92C 'willing':308C 'write':145C 'writer':39C,263C 'year':184C","writer",[],[],[],"Staff writer, The Atlantic","media-figure",[123],{"archetype_slug":89,"strength":124,"description":125},9,"From writing a president's speeches to a standing indictment of the American right — that arc is hawkish principle refusing to follow its own party downhill. Frum made the turn from The Atlantic, and your type reads it as consistency, not betrayal.",[]]