Methodology

How It Works

A straightforward explanation of how we map your political identity—from answering questions to discovering your unique strain among 32 possibilities.

Beyond Left vs. Right

Most political tests put you somewhere on a line from "left" to "right." But that single dimension can't capture someone who's fiscally conservative but socially liberal, or who supports free markets but opposes globalization.

Political science research consistently shows that at least two dimensions—often called economic and social—are needed to describe political beliefs accurately. Our assessment uses four dimensions to capture the full picture of modern political identity, then matches you to one of 32 distinct political strains.

"A unidimensional model of ideology provides an incomplete basis for the study of political ideology. Two dimensions—economic and social ideology—are the minimum needed to account for domestic policy preferences."
— Feldman & Johnston, Political Psychology, 2014

Four Dimensions of Political Identity

Each dimension represents a spectrum where most people fall somewhere in the middle, with fewer at the extremes. Your position on all four dimensions together creates your unique political profile.

Personal Liberty PLCF

How much freedom should individuals have versus how much should society regulate behavior for safety or morality?

← Control Freedom →

Economic System MESR

Should the economy be primarily driven by free markets, or should governments actively redistribute wealth and regulate industry?

← Regulation Markets →

National vs. Global DIPG

Should nations prioritize sovereignty and borders, or embrace international cooperation and open movement?

← National Global →

Cultural Values CULT

Should society preserve traditional values and institutions, or embrace progressive change on issues like gender, religion, and family?

← Traditional Progressive →

Why These Four?

Research on globalization has revealed new political divisions beyond traditional left-right economics. Kriesi et al. (2006) identified that globalization creates "winners" and "losers" whose political attitudes don't fit neatly into old categories—someone might support free trade but oppose immigration, or vice versa. Our four dimensions capture these crosscutting divisions.

32 Calibrated Questions

The Political DNA Scan asks 32 carefully designed questions. Each question presents a political statement, and you respond on a 5-point scale from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree.

6
Liberty Questions Government size, personal freedom, surveillance, crisis powers
6
Economic Questions Free markets, safety nets, unions, regulation, inequality
6
National Identity Questions Nationalism, trade, immigration, sovereignty
6
Cultural Questions Tradition, religion, gender roles, social change

Plus 8 Discriminator Questions

Some beliefs are especially powerful for distinguishing between strains. Questions about taxation philosophy, system change, abortion, gun rights, and a few other high-signal topics help pinpoint your exact strain when your four-dimensional profile could match multiple possibilities.

From Answers to Archetype

Here's what happens when you take the assessment:

1

Answer 32 Questions

Each question is designed to measure aspects of the four dimensions. You respond on a 5-point scale from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree. Questions are presented in themed blocks to help you think through related issues together.

2

Template Matching

Each of the 32 political strains has an "ideal response pattern"—what someone who perfectly exemplifies that strain would answer for each question. We compare your actual answers to all 32 templates simultaneously.

3

Calculate Match Scores

For each strain, we measure the "distance" between your responses and its ideal template. Smaller distance = closer match. These distances are converted to probability scores that sum to 100% across all 32 strains.

4

Identify Your Best Match

The strain with the highest probability becomes your primary result. We also calculate a confidence score—how much your top match stands out from the others. High confidence means you're a clear fit; lower confidence means you share traits with multiple strains (which is common and interesting).

Understanding Your Match Probability

If you score 45% for "Classical Liberal" with 92% confidence, it means: (1) Classical Liberal is the closest match among all 32 strains, (2) 45% of the total probability mass landed on this strain, and (3) you're a distinctively clear match—not borderline between types. Someone with 25% probability and 60% confidence would be a more ambiguous case, potentially fitting 2-3 strains reasonably well.

Belief Markers & Paradoxes

Beyond your strain match, we also identify specific "belief markers" from your strongest answers (like "Privacy Absolutist" if you strongly oppose surveillance, or "Pro-Choice Advocate" if you strongly support abortion rights). We also detect interesting "paradoxes"—combinations of positions that seem contradictory but reveal nuanced thinking, like supporting gun rights while championing progressive causes.

32 Political Strains, 8 Haplotypes

Your responses match you to one of 32 distinct political strains, organized into 8 "haplotypes"—clusters of related strains that share core characteristics. Think of haplotypes as branches on the political family tree.

The 8 Haplotypes

Libertarian (5 strains) · Progressive (5 strains) · Conservative (7 strains) · Socialist (3 strains) · Nationalist (3 strains) · Authoritarian (3 strains) · Globalist (3 strains) · Centrist (3 strains)

Here are a few example strains:

Compassionate Libertarian Libertarian haplotype. High liberty + markets + progressive culture. Believes free markets and personal freedom are the best path to help the vulnerable.
National Conservative Conservative haplotype. Moderate liberty + markets + strong nationalism + traditional values. Defends national sovereignty and cultural heritage.
Democratic Socialist Progressive haplotype. High liberty + regulated economy + globalist + progressive. Wants democratic control of economy with strong civil liberties.
Techno-Progressive Progressive haplotype. High liberty + mixed economy + globalist + progressive. Believes technology and innovation will solve most problems.
Welfare Nationalist Nationalist haplotype. Moderate liberty + regulated economy + nationalist + mixed culture. Supports strong social programs for citizens only.
Classical Liberal Globalist haplotype. High liberty + markets + globalist-leaning + moderate culture. Traditional free-market liberalism focused on individual rights.

The full set of 32 strains captures combinations you won't find in typical "left vs. right" frameworks—like market-loving progressives, liberty-focused traditionalists, or socialist nationalists.

What This Assessment Can't Do

We're upfront about limitations:

  • It's a snapshot, not a biography. 32 questions can't capture everything about your politics. It's a starting point for self-reflection, not the final word.
  • Cultural context matters. The assessment is designed for English-speaking democracies (primarily US, UK, Australia, Canada). Some questions may resonate differently elsewhere.
  • Politics changes. Our strains reflect current political coalitions. As issues shift, some strains may become more or less common.
  • Self-reporting has limits. You might answer aspirationally rather than reflecting actual behavior. That's human nature.
  • We don't predict your vote. Knowing your strain doesn't mean we know which candidate you'll support—many factors beyond ideology influence voting.
  • Despite the name, it's not genetic. "Political DNA" is a metaphor. We're mapping your stated beliefs, not your biology.

Your Data

We believe anonymity leads to honest answers. Here's our approach:

  • No account required. Take the full assessment without providing any personal information.
  • Anonymous analytics only. We track aggregate patterns (like "15% of users get this strain") but not individual people.
  • Share codes are anonymous. They encode your scores but contain no identifying information.
  • No data selling. We never sell or share personally-identifying response data.

The Research Behind It

Our framework synthesizes established political science research on belief structure and political dimensions:

  • Multidimensional ideology: Research consistently shows that economic and social attitudes are distinct dimensions that don't necessarily correlate (Feldman & Johnston, 2014; Converse, 1964).
  • Globalization cleavages: The divide between "winners" and "losers" of globalization has created new political coalitions that crosscut traditional left-right divisions (Kriesi et al., 2006, 2008).
  • GAL-TAN framework: European politics research identifies a Green/Alternative/Libertarian vs. Traditional/Authoritarian/Nationalist dimension alongside economic left-right (Hooghe et al., 2002).
  • Value foundations: Core values like liberty, equality, and security form the psychological basis for political attitudes (Schwartz et al., 2010; Feldman, 2003).

Going Deeper: The Full Sequence

After completing the Political DNA Scan, you can optionally take an extended assessment that incorporates additional frameworks including moral foundations research (Haidt et al.) and other psychological dimensions. This "Full Sequence" provides even more granular insights into the psychological roots of your political beliefs.

Key References

  • Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and Discontent. Free Press.
  • Feldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35(3), 337-358.
  • Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 965-989.
  • Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2006). Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research, 45(6), 921-956.
  • Kriesi, H., et al. (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge University Press.
  • Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values, and voting. Political Psychology, 31(3), 421-452.

Ready to Discover Your Political Strain?

32 questions. About 5 minutes. No signup required.

Begin Sequence